Transcript:Census Records for Israel Rogers=Elizabeth of Manahasset, Long Island

Watchers

Contents

Source

Ancestry.com census extracts, as noted in links below

Related

Person:Israel Rogers (3)

1800

1800 CEnsus:


CategoryValueDOBLikely Person
HOHIsrael Rogers--
Home in 1800 (City, County, State):North Hempstead,
Queens, New York
--
Free White Persons - Males - 45 and over: 1before or= 1755Person:Israel Rogers (3)
Free White Persons - Females - 10 thru 15: 11785-1790
Free White Persons - Females - 16 thru 25: 11775-1784Elizabeth
Free White Persons - Females - 45 and over: 1before or =1755Rebecca
Number of Household Members Under 16: 1before 1784-
Number of Household Members Over 25: 2before 1775-
Number of Household Members: 4
Ancestry 1800 Suffolk NY gives 45 Roger's heads of household in Suffolk County.

1810

Ancestry 1810 census gives 45 Rogers HOH in suffolk County, but no Israel

A separate search for Israel in New York gave no hits.

1820

No hits in New York for Israel Rogers

1830

CategoryValueDOBLikely Person
Name: Israel Rogers--
Home in 1830 (City, County, State): North Hampstead, Queens, New York--
Free White Persons - Males - 80 thru 89: 1 1741-1750Person:Israel Rogers (3)
Free White Persons - Females - 70 thru 79: 11751-1760Rebecca
Total Free White Persons: 2--
Total - All Persons (Free White, Slaves, Free Colored): 2--

1840

New York, 1840

A search of the 1840 Census New York shows numerous ROger's in Suffolk COunty, but no Israel. There is a Rebecca Rogers HOH, but she is too young to be the wife of Israel. A similar search for Queens County yielded neither an Israel nor a Rebecca Rogers.

Comment

Israel Rogers appears in the US Census records, as shown on Ancestry, in only the 1800 and 1830 census. In both cases he appears as HOH in North Hemstead, QUeens, Long Island. It is possible that he may have living elsewhere in 1810, and 1820. If so, he does not appear anywhere else in New York State. It is also possible, and may perhaps be more likely, that he was living in North Hempstead, perhaps in someone else's household, and therefor not identified as a HOH. It is also possible that he was simply missed.