ViewsWatchers |
[add comment] [edit] Genealogy attempted by the archaeologists is laughable [5 November 2014]This family really deserves better than they have gotten. If you read the report prepared by the historical consultants 2001-2003 http://s-media.nyc.gov/agencies/lpc/arch_reports/610.pdf it contains the incrediably poor methodological statement "an internet check of telephone directories for the New York metropolitan area identified a number of Van Alsts, but none in Queens. Without directly contacting these individuals it is impossible to determine if any of these individuals is related to Harry Van Alst who arranged for the 1925 reinterments." http://s-media.nyc.gov/agencies/lpc/arch_reports/610.pdf--Artefacts 00:56, 5 November 2014 (UTC) [add comment] [edit] Tasks in Progress [6 November 2014]Hello Artefacts! Don't want you to think I have abandoned this interesting project. I have been reading up on the back story of the family and cemetery and creating preliminary Person and Family pages for the skeleton of the descendancy, mostly from Riker right now, but with a goal of adding in better source support as we go along. I will continue to do so as time permits today. My understanding of our goal is to identify original interments and modern descendants. Is that how you see it as well? Regards, --Cos1776 16:09, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
|