ViewsWatchers |
[add comment] [edit] No evidence of delayed baptism, so use proxying [6 December 2021]The birth year inferred from the overlijdensakte is ˜1766, but the birth year inferred from the huwelijksakte is ˜1770, which matches well with the doopakte. So it makes sense to use the WR proxying for baptism and omit the much less well defined birth. --pkeegstra 12:07, 6 December 2021 (UTC) |