Person talk:James Bigelow (1)

birth date: assumption (bad one at that) masquerading as fact [16 January 2012]

I removed the birth date of 1 Apr 1662. This would make James a twin with Martha. It is unlikely that one twin would be recorded and not the other, since Martha's birth is recorded, but James is not, as noted in the Bigelow Genealogy. Besides the VR, and the Bigelow Genealogy, Bond has no birth date, and Dean Crawford Smith in Ancestry of Eva Belle Kempton, says "born say 1660". It seems pretty clear that no record of his birth has been found. --Jrich 14:16, 16 January 2012 (EST)