Ruth wiswall
15 (3) 56
so 15 (4) 56.
[Note, according to Source:Linzee, John William. History of Peter Parker and Sarah Ruggles of Roxbury, Mass. and Their Ancestors and Descendants, p. 399,Ruth was bapt. 15 (3) 1656, so that has been followed. But the line that follows the baptism record is confusing, and makes one wonder if it is a part of this record? Based on some of the entries for some of the elder children, it would not be surprising to find out the intent is that Ruth was born 15 (3) 56 and so baptized 15 (4) 56? But that would be speculation and is only noted as a possibility that may be clearer if more evidence is found.]
[Note: In old-styles dates, the third month is May. More info may be found here.]
