Person:Ruth Warner (5)

Ruth Warner

d.Aft 18 Jun 1681

Family tree▼

m. 5 Oct 1624

Facts and Events

Name^[1]^[2]	Ruth Warner
Gender	Female
Birth^[1]	Cal 1641	Hartford, Hartford, Connecticut, United States (probably)
Living^[1]	18 Jun 1681	Named in father's will of that date.
Death^[1]	Aft 18 Jun 1681

References

↑ ^1.0 ^1.1 ^1.2 ^1.3 Andrew Warner, in Anderson, Robert Charles. The Great Migration Begins: Immigrants to New England, 1620-1633. (Boston: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 1995)
3:1931.

Ruth (Warner), b. about 1641 ("Wariner _____ about 16 y" 10 December 1657; living unmarried on 18 June 1681 (date of father's will); perhaps married John Kellogg [Warner Harrington 705].
↑ Ruth² Warner, in Warner, Lucien C, and Josephine Genung Nichols. The Descendants of Andrew Warner. (New Haven, Conn.: Tuttle, Morehouse & Taylor Co., 1919)
47-48.

The name of her husband has been variously reported as John or Daniel Pratt, _____ Caley, or _____ Kellogg. The Pratt is doubtless an error for her sister Hannah's marriage. The name Caley does not appear among the early colonists. Of the early Kelloggs but one is recorded as having a wife Ruth. John⁴ Kellogg, son of Lieutenant Joseph³ Kellogg, bapt. in Farmington, Conn., Dec 29, 1656, m. (i) in Hadley, Dec. 23, 1680, Sarah Moody, b. 1660, d. 1689, m. (2) Ruth _____, who died after 1732. He died between 1723 and 1728. By this second marriage he had six children, born between 1693 and 1701, Ruth, Joanna, Esther, Abigail, John and James. (Kelloggs in the old world and new, p. 35.)

NOTE: In order for her to be the mother of John⁴ Kellogg's six children, she would have to have been born no earlier than about 1656. It would seem highly unlikely that she was Kellogg's wife and mother of those children.