Person:Ruth Harkness (5)

Watchers
Ruth Harkness
d.Aft 1855
m. 8 Dec 1787
  1. Robert Harkness1787 -
  2. Hannah Harkness1789 -
  3. Buffum Harkness1791 -
  4. Mary Harkness1793 -
  5. Ruth Harkness1795 - Aft 1855
  6. Elizabeth Harkness1797 -
  7. John Harkness1798 - 1801
  8. Amy Harkness1800 -
  9. John Harkness1802 - 1805
  10. Nathan Harkness1804 - 1805
  11. Nancy Harkness1806 -
m. 25 Feb 1816
  1. Horatio A. Nelson1816 - 1887
  2. Eliza Nelson1818 - 1853
  3. Emeline Melissa Nelson1820 -
  4. John M. Nelson1822 - 1826
  5. Mary Nelson1824 - 1832
  6. Lafayette Nelson1827 - 1863
  7. Ezekiel V. Nelson1829 - 1895
  8. George W. Nelson1832 - 1894
Facts and Events
Name Ruth Harkness
Gender Female
Birth[1] 8 Apr 1795 Richmond, Cheshire, New Hampshire, United States
Marriage 25 Feb 1816 Richmond, Cheshire, New Hampshire, United Statesto Ezekiel Nelson
Death[2][3] Aft 1855
References
  1. Richmond (New Hampshire). Town Clerk. Records of births, deaths, and marriages, 1750-1916. (Salt Lake City, Utah: Genealogical Society of Utah, 2000)
    p. 31.

    this may Cartify that John Harkness and Eliezabeth Sweet Both of Richmond Ware Joined in marrage the 8th Day of January AD 1797. P'r Henry Ingalls Just peace.
    Record of John Harkness Children by Elizabeth his wife
    ...
    Ruth Harkness born April ye 8th AD 1795.

  2. Franklin, Massachusetts, United States. 1855 Massachusetts State Census
    right side, line 21.

    living with son Lafayette, not found in 1860

  3. Allred, p. 199, lists Lafayette as s/o Ezekiel & Ruth Nelson, but gives his father Ezekiel a wife Eunice, d. 28 May 1851, based on a gravestone in Kelton Cemetery. Clearly Allred is confused, as no gravestone for any person dying in 1851 is found in Kelton Cemetery per Find A Grave, and Ezekiel's actual wife Ruth was living in 1855 with her son Lafayette. Source:Bassett, William. History of the Town of Richmond, Cheshire County, New Hampshire : From Its First Settlement, to 1882, p. 447, says Ruth d. Sep 1859, age 64, for which claim the basis is not known, nor is the death or burial location known, but she has not been located in the 1860 census and this is at least consistent with the facts that we do know.