Person:Mary Durkee (4)

Watchers
m. 22 Mar 1689
  1. John Durkee1689 - 1751
  2. Andrew Durkee1692 - Bef 1739
  3. Jeremiah Durkee1694/95 -
  4. Elizabeth Durkee1697 - 1752
  5. William Durkee1699/00 -
  6. Thomas Durkee1701/02 - 1724
  7. Patience Durkee1703 -
  8. Stephen Durkee1706 - 1769
  9. Sarah Durkee1707/08 -
  10. Mary Durkee1709 - Bef 1711
  11. Mary Durkee1711 - 1749
  • H.  Ebenezer Wallbridge (add)
  • WMary Durkee1711 - 1749
m. 2 Dec 1730
Facts and Events
Name[4] Mary Durkee
Gender Female
Birth[1] 3 Jan 1711 Gloucester, Essex, Massachusetts, United States
Marriage 2 Dec 1730 Norwich, New London, Connecticut, United Statesto Ebenezer Wallbridge (add)
Death[2][3] 19 May 1749 Norwich, New London, Connecticut, United States
References
  1. Gloucester, Essex, Massachusetts, United States. Vital Records of Gloucester, Massachusetts, to the End of the Year 1849. (Salem, Massachusetts.: Essex Institute, 1917)
    1:232.

    Durgee, Mary, d. John and Elizabeth, [born] June 3, 1711.
    [Second daughter of this name born into this family.]

  2. Norwich, New London, Connecticut, United States. Vital Records of Norwich, 1659-1848. (Hartford, Conn.: Society of Colonial Wars in the State of Connecticut, 1913)
    p. 160.

    Mary ye Wife of Ebenezer Wallbridge Died may 19th : 1749:

  3. Gunderson, Bernice. "Which Mary Durkee Married Ebenezer Wallbridge?", in The Connecticut Nutmegger. (East Hartford, Connecticut: Connecticut Society of Genealogists)
    Vol. 19, p. 472.

    Grave Stone Record found at Connecticut State Library in Hartford:
    MARY WALLBRIDGE
    died 19 May 1749, Norwich
    age 38, Spouse Ebenezer
    [Birth about 1711]

  4. Gunderson, Bernice. "Additional Data on Mary Durkee", in The Connecticut Nutmegger. (East Hartford, Connecticut: Connecticut Society of Genealogists)
    Vol. 21, p. 401.

    Will of John Durkee names four daughters and their husbands, including Mary who married Ebenezer Wallbridge. They claimed their portion 28 Jun 1743.

  5.   There is a death record found in Gloucester for "Mary Durgee", d. John, on 17 Nov 1713. On face value, it would seem to apply to this Mary, but the cited sources show this cannot be. Presumably the death record, then, has been misrecorded or mistranscribed, and probably was meant to apply to the first daughter Mary, b. 25 Oct 1709 (perhaps it should say 17 Nov 1709 or 17 Nov 1710?)