Person:Margaret Sherman (3)

m. 27 Dec 1710
  1. Margaret Sherman1711 - 1782
  2. Jacob Sherman1713 - 1778
  3. David Sherman1715 - 1751
  4. Edmund Sherman1718/19 - 1785
  5. John Sherman1720 - 1789
  6. Nehemiah Sherman1722 - 1802
  7. Abigail Sherman1724/25 - 1797
  8. Hannah Sherman1727 - 1797
  9. Lydia Sherman1729 - Bef 1751
  10. Judith Sherman1732 - 1792
m. 10 May 1733
  1. Abigail Braley1734 - 1854
  2. David Braley1735 - 1809
  3. Russell Braley1736/37 - 1815
  4. Solomon Braley1738 - 1771
  5. Roger Braley
  6. Lydia Braley1740 - 1816
  7. Israel Braley1742 - 1862
  8. Elijah Braley1744 - 1816
  9. Hannah Braley1746 -
  10. Caleb Braley1747 - 1814
  11. Ezekiel Braley1749 - 1836
  12. Margaret Braley1752 - 1788
  13. George Braley1754 -
Facts and Events
Name[2] Margaret Sherman
Gender Female
Birth[1] 13 Dec 1711 Dartmouth, Bristol, Massachusetts, United States
Marriage 10 May 1733 Dartmouth, Bristol, Massachusetts, United Statesto Roger Brailey
Death[3] 1782 Bellingham, Norfolk, Massachusetts, United States
References
  1. Dartmouth, Bristol, Massachusetts, United States. Vital Records of Dartmouth, Massachusetts, to the Year 1850. (Boston, Massachusetts: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 1929-1930)
    1:227.

    Shearman, Margreat, d. David, Dec. 13, 1711. (Rec. with chn. of David and Abigail.)

  2. Randall, Eunice Kelley Gidley. David O'Killia the immigrant of Old Yarmouth, Massachusetts with his descendants and allied families, 1652-1962. (Dartmouth, Massachusetts: E.K.G. Randall, 1962)
    p. 47.

    Elisha O'Killey ... married March 9, 1767 in Dartmouth, Massachusetts Lydia Braley born July 29, 1740, died September 14, 1816. She was a daughter of Roger and Margaret (Sherman).

  3. There aren't many deaths listed in Bellingham VRs before 1800, and I don't find Margaret Braley listed. Instead, I find p. 90: Brale, Margret, Mrs., of Darthmoth, and Joseph Killey, int. Feb. 2, 1782. Source:Braley genealogy : the descendants of Roger Braley, 1696-1913 (136151), p. 7, identifies this as a second marriage for Margaret, though one must remember that there is a daughter named Margaret born in 1752 who may be more likely to be getting married than her 70 year old mother.