Person:Lydia Hawes (4)

Watchers
Lydia Hawes
b.Abt 1753
m. 15 Nov 1750
  1. Lydia HawesAbt 1753 - 1827
  2. Pelatiah HawesAbt 1756 - 1846
  3. Elizabeth HawesAbt 1761 -
m. 11 Jan 1776
  1. Son Ruggles1777 - 1777
  2. Nancy Ruggles1778 - 1781
  3. Unity Ruggles1780 -
  4. Beriah Ruggles1783 - Bet 1850 & 1855
  5. Hephzibah Ruggles1785 - 1864
  6. Lyman Ruggles1788 - 1863
Facts and Events
Name[4] Lydia Hawes
Gender Female
Birth[1] Abt 1753
Marriage 11 Jan 1776 New Braintree, Worcester, Massachusetts, United Statesto Samuel Ruggles
Death[1][2][3] 22 Aug 1827 Royalston, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
Burial[3] Athol, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
References
  1. 1.0 1.1 Orange (Massachusetts). Town Clerk. Births and deaths, 1770-1850. (Salt Lake City, Utah: Genealogical Society of Utah, 1972)
    p. 4.

    Lydia Ruggles Wife of Sam'l Ruggles Died in Royalston Aug 22 1827 aged 74.

  2. Royalston, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States. Vital records of Royalston, Massachusetts, to the end of the year 1849. (Worcester, Massachusetts: Franklin P. Rice, 1906)
    p. 189.

    RUGGLES, ---, w. Samuel, [died] Aug. 22, 1827, a. 76.Dropsy.

  3. 3.0 3.1 Athol, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States. Vital records of Athol, Massachusetts, to the End of the Year 1849. (Worcester, Massachusetts: Franklin P. Rice, 1910)
    p. 218.

    RUGGLES, Lydia H., w. Samuel, [died] Aug. 22, 1827, a. 74. GS1

  4. Hawes, Raymond Gordon. The Edward Hawes heirs: Edward Hawes, ca. 1616-1687, of Dedham, Massachusetts, and his wife, Eliony Lumber : and some of their descendants through eleven generations. (Baltimore [Maryland]: Gateway Press, 1996)
    p. 33.

    Children of Beriah Hawes and 2nd wife Patience Warner: Lydia b. New Braintree ca 1758, m. New Braintree 11 Jan 1776 Samuel Ruggles.
    [Note: the basis for a birth estimate in 1758 is unknown and besides not agreeing with the age at death, makes her only 16 at marriage which is unlikely, and leaves six years from parents' marriage to first listed child, Pelatiah in 1756, which seems unlikely as well.]