Person:Joseph Temple (2)

m. 2 May 1699
  1. Mary Temple1700 - 1767
  2. Thomas Temple1701 - 1701
  3. Thomas Temple1702 -
  4. William Temple1704 -
  5. Mercy TempleAbt 1705 - 1760
  6. Joseph TempleAbt 1707 - Aft 1757
  7. Benjamin TempleAbt 1708 - Bet 1767 & 1769
  8. Deborah TempleAbt 1710 -
  9. Abigail Temple1711 - Bef 1754
  10. Sarah Temple1713 - 1810
  11. Abraham Temple1715 - Bef 1756
  12. Huldah Temple1716/17 -
  13. John TempleAbt 1719 -
  • HJoseph TempleAbt 1707 - Aft 1757
  • W.  Mary Laughton (add)
m. 3 Dec 1739
Facts and Events
Name Joseph Temple
Gender Male
Birth[1] Abt 1707 possibly Stow, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United States
Marriage 3 Dec 1739 Concord, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United Statesto Mary Laughton (add)
Death? Aft 1757 Worcester, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
  1. Temple, Levi Daniel. Some Temple pedigrees: A genealogy of the known descendants of Abraham Temple, who settled in Salem, Mass., in 1636. To which is added genealogies of Temple families settling in Reading, Mass., Chester Co., Pa., Ayletts, Va., Galway, N.Y., and elsewhere. Also brief genealogies of families connected by marriage with the foregoing. Viz: Eames, Case, Welch, Kellum, Campbell, Wilson, Hiatt, Spay, Cook, Tredway and Murdock. (Boston: David Clapp & Son, 1900)
    p. 19.

    Children of Richard Temple and Mary Barker: Joseph, b. Stow about 1709, m. Concord 3 Dec 17369 Mary Laughton. Admitted to church in Shrewsbury 1728, dismissed to Worcester 1741.
    [Note: This source has question marks/estimates for 6 children, but apparently did not take advantage of the will, and the ordering found there. So its estimates apparently give an incorrect birth order. The three younger sons are given twice in the same order: William, Joseph and Benjamin. Benjamin's birth has been estimated by this source as about 1708. To make Joseph before him, we place his birth about 1707. We put Mercy between William and Joseph just to break up a long string of boys (based on odds), but our information is really only precise enough to say that she could fall anywhere between William and Deborah. Her placement clearly affects estimates somewhat.]