Person:John Peabody (23)

Watchers
John Peabody
d.4 Mar 1690 Spain
m. 23 Nov 1665
  1. John Peabody1666 - 1690
  2. Hannah PeabodyAbt 1668 -
  3. Thomas Peabody1670 -
  4. Mary Peabody1672 - 1731
  5. Lydia Peabody1673/74 - 1732
  6. Francis Peabody1676 - 1704
  7. David Peabody1678 - 1726
  8. Elizabeth Peabody1680 -
  9. Deacon Nathan Peabody1682 - 1732/33
  10. Ruth Peabody1684 - 1759
  11. Moses Peabody1686/87 -
Facts and Events
Name[4] John Peabody
Gender Male
Birth[1][2] 28 Aug 1666 Topsfield, Essex, Massachusetts, United States
Death[3][4] 4 Mar 1690 Spain
References
  1. Topsfield, Essex, Massachusetts, United States. Vital Records of Topsfield, Massachusetts to the End of the Year 1849. (Topsfield, Massachusetts: Topsfield Historical Society, 1903, 1916)
    p. 72.

    PABODYE, John, s. John, Aug. 28, 1666. CT.R.

  2. Boxford, Essex, Massachusetts, United States. Vital Records of Boxford, Massachusetts, to the End of the Year 1849. (Topsfield, Massachusetts: Topsfield Historical Society, 1905)
    p. 65.

    PEABODY, [John. BC], s. John and Hannah, [born] Aug. [29, 1666. BC]
    [BC=copy and compilation of town records made in 1823 by John Bacon, town clerk. Note see parents' family page for discussion of birth location.]

  3. Boxford, Essex, Massachusetts, United States. Vital Records of Boxford, Massachusetts, to the End of the Year 1849. (Topsfield, Massachusetts: Topsfield Historical Society, 1905)
    p. 252.

    PEABODY, John, s. John and Hannah (Andrews), died young, ---, ---. BC
    [BC=copy and compilation of town records made in 1823 by John Bacon, town clerk]

  4. 4.0 4.1 Peabody, Selim Hobart, and Charles Henry Pope. Peabody (Paybody, Pabody, Pabodie) genealogy. (Boston, Massachusetts: Charles H. Pope, publisher, 1909 (Boston, Mass. : Press of C.H. Simmonds & Co.))
    p. 18.

    Children of Capt. John Peabody and Hannah Andrews: 1) John, b. 29 Aug 1666, d. Spain, unm., 4 Mar 1690.
    [Note: clearly this differs from above. Unfortunately, the basis for the death date is not explained, but it seems likely there is something to cause assertion of such an odd death, and it also seems very feasible given that there is no death in Topsfield (if he had been very young), and they do not appear to have reused the name as one would expect if he had died during childbearing years.]