Person:Hezekiah Allen (2)

Browse
m. 10 Nov 1673
  1. Mary Allen
  2. Thankful Allen
  3. Joseph Allen1676 - 1727
  4. Hannah Allen1679 - Aft 1744/45
  5. Daniel Allen1681 -
  6. David Allen1682/83 -
  7. Noah Allen1685 - 1754
  8. Eleazer Allen1688 - 1759
  9. Jeremy Allen1690 -
  10. Hezekiah Allen1692 - 1775
  11. Abigail Allen1694 -
  12. Nehemiah Allen1699 - 1785
  • HHezekiah Allen1692 - 1775
  • WMary Draper1698 - 1775
m. 4 Apr 1722
  1. Hezekiah Allen1724 - 1798
  2. Mary Allen1727 -
  3. Timothy Allen1729 - 1736
  4. Elizabeth Allen1731 -
  5. Hannah Allen1733 -
  6. Mehitable Allen1736 -
  7. Abigail Allen1741/42 -
Facts and Events
Name Hezekiah Allen
Gender Male
Birth[1] 3 Nov 1692 Medfield, Norfolk, Massachusetts, United States
Marriage 4 Apr 1722 Dedham, Norfolk, Massachusetts, United Statesto Mary Draper
Death[2][3] 16 Aug 1775 Dover, Norfolk, Massachusetts, United States
References
  1. Medfield, Norfolk, Massachusetts, United States. Vital Records of Medfield, Massachusetts, to the Year 1850. (Boston, Massachusetts: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 1903)
    16.

    ALLIN, Hizekiah, s. Joseph and Hann[torn], Nov. 3, 1692.

  2. Dover, Norfolk, Massachusetts, United States. Vital Records of Dover, Massachusetts, to the Year 1850. (Boston, Massachusetts: New England Historic Genealogical Society at the charge of the Eddy Town Record Fund, 1908)
    p. 85.

    ALLEN, Hezekiah, Capt. [h. Mary], [died] Aug. 16, 1775, a. 83. GR [in Dedham, PR1]

  3. Dedham (Massachusetts). Town Clerk; Julius Herbert Tuttle; Benjamin Fisher; and Don Gleason Hill. The early records of the town of Dedham, Massachusetts. (Dedham, Massachusetts: Dedham Transcript Press, 1886-1936)
    p. 116.

    Cap't Hezekiah Allen, Obt. August 16th, 1775.

  4.   A note found in the Source:Dedham Historical Register (Dedham Historical Society), Vol. 6, p. 43 gives a useful summary of the basics of Hezekiah Allen's life. However, both he and his son were called Capt. in their respective death records in Dedham, so the case of mis-identification being discussed appears to result from confusion on the note writer's part.