Person:Elizabeth Vickery (3)

Watchers
Elizabeth Vickery
b.Abt 1683
  1. Elizabeth VickeryAbt 1683 - Abt 1714
  2. Jonathan VickeryAbt 1684 - 1741
  3. David VickeryAft 1685 -
  4. Joanna VickeryAbt 1687 - 1720
  5. Mary VickeryAbt 1689 - Bef 1714
  6. Sarah VickeryBef 1702 - Bef 1714
  7. Rebecca VickeryBef 1703 - Aft 1723
m. 27 Jan 1704/05
  1. Sarah Collins
  2. Gamaliel CollinsAbt 1708 - 1775
  3. James CollinsBef 1708 - Bef 1731
Facts and Events
Name Elizabeth Vickery
Gender Female
Birth[1][2][4][5] Abt 1683
Marriage 27 Jan 1704/05 Eastham, Barnstable, Massachusetts, United Statesto Jonathan Collins
Death[1][3] Abt 1714 Chatham, Barnstable, Massachusetts, United States
References
  1. 1.0 1.1 Pane-Joyce, David. Pane-Joyce Genealogy.

    Tells story of kidnapping by French privateers in Queen Anne's war (1702-1713) at age 18, which calculates to birth 1684-1695.

  2. Hull, Massachusetts, in The New England Historical and Genealogical Register. (Boston: New England Historic Genealogical Society)
    143:341.

    Says age 18 during kidnapping but provides no indication of which year this happened. Places birth about 1679 with no explanation.

  3. Joseph Collins of Eastham, in The New England Historical and Genealogical Register. (Boston: New England Historic Genealogical Society)
    151:11.
  4. Nickerson, Warren Sears, and Delores Bird Carpenter. Early Encounters--Native Americans and Europeans in New England: From the Papers of W. Sears Nickerson. (MSU Press, 1994)
    123.

    online version: "About 20" in Sept 1704, marriage banns to Jonathan Collins posted on church door, when kidnapping occurred. [The telling in this source, though more detailed, seems so romanticized that it appears to be more family tradition than fact.]

  5. Elizabeth appears to be the oldest daughter in the family, and marriage in early 1705 suggests born before 1687, so she would be age 18 by marriage date. She is usually listed first in the family, which I presume is based on the order of children in the father's probate documents. Since we have a pretty good idea that brother Jonathan is born in 1684, for her to be older, her birth could be about 1683. (I entered this, in agreement with many sources, but this is not a great fit with the story of the privateers which suggest a birthdate in 1684 or even later. If one assumes Jonathan is the oldest child in the family as Source:A history of Chatham, Massachusetts : formerly the constablewick or village of Monomoit, with maps and illustrations and numerous genealogical notes does, one could make a reasonable case that Elizabeth is born about 1685. There is room to do this since we know the next child, David, was underage in 1706 and hence born after 1685.)