Person:Elizabeth Osland (2)

Watchers
Browse
Elizabeth Osland
d.Aft 1723
m. 7 Mar 1666/67
  1. Elizabeth Osland1667/68 - Aft 1723
m. 11 Mar 1692/93
  1. Abigail WilsonAbt 1700 -
  2. Mary WilsonAbt 1703 -
  3. Thankful WilsonAbt 1706 - 1800
  4. Relief WilsonAbt 1707 - 1770
Facts and Events
Name Elizabeth Osland
Gender Female
Birth[1][2] 25 Jan 1667/68 Newton, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United States
Marriage 11 Mar 1692/93 Newton, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United Statesto Nathaniel Wilson
Death[3][4] Aft 1723
References
  1. Newton, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United States. Vital Records of Newton, Massachusetts, to the Year 1850. (Boston, Massachusetts: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 1905)
    p. 146.

    OSLAND, Elizabeth, d. Humphrey and Eliz[abe]th, [born] Jan. 25, 1667.
    [Note: assumed to be 1667/68 based on typical usage..]

  2. Baldwin, Thomas W. Vital Records of Cambridge, Massachusetts, to the Year of 1850. (Boston: Wright & Potter Printing Co., 1914-15)
    Vol. 1, p. 529.

    OSLAND, Elizab[eth], d. of Humphrey and Elizab[eth], Jan. 25, 1667.

  3. Middlesex Probate 16286: Division of estate of Humphrey Osland Late of Newton, dated 16 May 1723, names as heir "Elizabeth Willson the Eldest Daughter of the S'd Deceased", and is signed by her..
  4. Source:Framingham, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United States. Vital Records to the Year 1850, p. 473, has a death record for Elezebeth, w. of Nathaniell Willson, in 1715, and Source:Barry, William. History of Framingham, Massachusetts, p. 442, applies it to this Elizabeth, but since she signed the division of heirs in 1723, something is clearly amiss...

    Nathaniel's son Nathaniel also had a wife Elizabeth (Reed), and as the death date of 10 Mar 1715 is 2 weeks after the wife of the younger Nathaniel gave birth to a daughter Elizabeth, it is probably her death that was recorded. The son Nathaniel leaves a widow Elizabeth, but his probate [Middlesex Probate 25170] has signs that it is second wife (a petition protests the will, referring to Elizabeth as Nathaniel's "then wife" (i.e., at the time the will was written), and Mary Rust, the only child, charges the estate for taking care of the widow, not of her mother. Even Barry says the wid. Elizabeth had a daughter-in-law Rust, which the petition says is the only surviving child of Nathaniel, the "in-law" part indicating she is not the mother, i.e., is a second wife, even though Barry does not mention 2 wives. All this to further suggest the death in 1715 is the wife of the son, not this Elizabeth.