Person:Betty Hutchins (1)

Betty Hutchins
 
m. 2 Feb 1721
  1. Bethiah Hutchins1725/26 -
  2. Benjamin Hutchins1727/28 -
  3. Sarah Hutchins1729 - 1813
  4. William HutchensAbt 1735 - Bef 1779
  5. Betty Hutchins - 1772
m. 7 Jul 1756
  1. Betty Whitney1756 -
  2. Bethia Whitney1757 -
  3. Lucy Whitney1759 -
  4. Moses Whitney1761 -
Facts and Events
Name Betty Hutchins
Gender Female
Marriage 7 Jul 1756 Harvard, Worcester, Massachusetts, United Statesto Moses Whitney
Death[1] 24 Mar 1772 Templeton, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
References
  1. Templeton, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States. Vital Records of Templeton, Massachusetts, to the End of the Year 1849. (Worcester, Massachusetts: F.P. Rice, 1907)
    p. 210.

    WHITNEY, Betty, w. Moses, [died] March 24, 1772, in 45th year. GS1
    [Note: this would suggest a birth about 1727, see other sources. Find A Grave has no image and just cites this record.]

  2.   Byam, Edwin Colby, and Jack Randolph Hutchins. Descendants of John Hutchins of Newbury and Haverhill, Massachusetts. (Rockville, Maryland: J.R. Hutchins, c1975 (Washington, D.C. : Goetz Press))
    p. 20.

    Children of William Hutchins [#15] and Bethiah Carleton: Elizabeth, bp. 10 Mar 1722/3 "this seems erroneous for 1732/3" [see comment on baptism source], d. 24 Mar 1722, m. Harvard 7 Jul 1756 Moses Whitney.

  3.   Bradford, Essex, Massachusetts, United States. Vital records of Bradford, Massachusetts, to the End of the Year 1849. (Topsfield, Mass.: Topsfield Historical Society, 1907)
    p. 89.

    HUTCHINS, Elizabeth, d. W[illia]m and Bethiah, bp. Mar. 10, 1722-3. CR1
    [Note: the source above thinks this is mistranscribed, presumably because it is such a bad match to the age at death. Age at death is not contemporary record of her birth, as it is the secondhand recollection of survivors, and given that it makes her older than her husband by about 6 years, it may be suspect. Additionally, we cannot verify that the gravestone has been read correctly since we have image available. The parentage is correct because Betty Whitney is named in her father's will dated 1764 (Worcester Probate 32264). However, the order in which she is named, which strongly appears to be in birth order, suggests she is the youngest child of Bethiah, so born after William "b. ca. 1735". This would require her age at death to be overstated by about 10 years, ie., born about 1737, age 35 at death. There is always the possibility, given the spotty records on this family, that the first Elizabeth died and the survivor was actually the second daughter of the name. There does not appear to be any coalescence of the sources around any single date and more research is needed.]