Family:Nathan Rugg and Zerviah Frost (1)

Parents: Daniel Rugg and Elizabet Priest Nathan Rugg chr. 30 Nov 1718 Lancaster, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States d. 15 Sep 1786 Lancaster, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States	Parents: John Frost and Ruth Scripture Zerviah Frost b. 20 Mar 1719/20 Groton, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United States d. 8 Apr 1807 Lancaster, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States

Family tree▼

Facts and Events

Marriage^[1]^[2]

12 Nov 1741

Children

		Birth	Death
1.	Nathan Rugg	21 Apr 1743 Lancaster, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States	23 Nov 1787 Keene, Cheshire, New Hampshire, United States
2.	Zerviah Rugg	10 Aug 1745 Lancaster, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
3.	Relief Rugg	29 May 1748 Lancaster, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
4.	Abijah Rugg	30 Jul 1750 Lancaster, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
5.	Elijah Rugg	4 Apr 1753 Lancaster, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States	1 May 1810 Lancaster, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
6.	Elisha Rugg	30 Apr 1755 Lancaster, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
7.	Keziah Rugg	11 May 1757 Lancaster, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States	Bef 1790
8.	Katharine Rugg	29 Nov 1759 Lancaster, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States

References

↑ Groton, Middlesex, Massachusetts, United States. Vital Records of Groton, Massachusetts, to the End of the Year 1849. (Salem, Massachusetts: Essex Institute, 1926-1927)
Vol. 2, p. 147.

RUGG, Nathaniel [Nathan, CR1], of Lancaster, and Zeruiah Frost, Dec. 12, 1740. [Nov. 12, 1741. CR1]
↑ Nourse, Henry Stedman. Birth, Marriage, and Death Register, Church Records and Epitaphs of Lancaster, Massachusetts, 1643-1850. (Clinton, Massachusetts: W.J. Coulter, 1890)
p. 29.

Nathan Rugg Entered his Intention of marriage with Zerviah Frost of Groaton April ye 21st 1740.
[Note: this is entered with several records from February and March 1740 and preceding records for May and June 1741, and probably should say April 1741. Since the first child is not born until 1743, a marriage in 1740 would leave an unusually large gap with no children.]