Family:Jeremiah Kingsbury and Rest White (1)

Watchers
Browse
Facts and Events
Marriage[1][3] 22 Sep 1727 Boston, Suffolk, Massachusetts, United States
Children
BirthDeath
References
  1. Endicott, Frederic. The Record of Births, Marriages And Deaths And Intentions of Marriage, in The Town of Stoughton From 1727 to 1800, And in The Town of Canton From 1797-1845: Preceded by the Records of the South Precinct of Dorchester, from 1715 to 1727. (Canton, Massachusetts: Printed by W. Bense, 1896)
    p. 271:.

    BOSTON
    Jeremia Kingsbury & Rest White both of Stoughton were married by Timothy Clark, Esq., Sept. 22, 1727.
    [Also, p. 23: "The Names of Jeremiah Kingsbury & Rest White both of stough* * there Intentions of marriage was Intred with me ye 2'nd * * * December, 1728. & have ben posted vp. & since haue * * published as the Law directs. By me Joseph Tuck * * * *"]

  2.   "Boston Marriages, 1727", in Record Commissioners of the City of Boston. Boston Marriages, 1700-1751. (Boston, Suffolk, Massachusetts, United States: Municipal Printing Office, 1898)
    p. 139.

    Jeremia Kingsbury & Rest White both of Stoughton [by] Tim Clark Esqr. J.P. Sept. 22, 1727.

  3. Obviously the marriage date in Boston is inconsistent with the date of the intentions. Their first child appears to be born in 12 Sep 1729. The intention seems to be transcribed correctly, and context of the surrounding records suggests the date is correct (53). No explanation is known. Worrisome however, is a record found in Source:Cemetery Transcriptions from the NEHGS Manuscript Collection for wife of Jeremiah Kingsbury in Dedham 22 Sep 1727. Is this a data entry error, the marriage being entered as a gravestone? No such gravestone is listed in Source:Dedham, Norfolk, Massachusetts, United States. Church Records, Baptisms, Marriages and Deaths, 1638-1845 or Source:Find A Grave. But if Jeremiah had a first wife who died 22 Sep 1727, then the intentions might be correct, with the marriage occurring soon after, in very early 1729? Such records have not been found, however.