Menu
Home
Search
▼
All
People
Families
Articles
Images
Places
Sources
List
▼
People
Contributions
Add
▼
Person
Family
Article
Image
Place
MySource
Source
Transcript
Repository
User Page
Other Page
Import GEDCOM
My Relate
▼
Dashboard
Network
Watchlist
User Profile
Talk Page
My Trees
Show duplicates
Data Quality Issues
Admin
▼
Recent changes
Nominate
Logs
New Images
Review needed
Gedcom review
Speedy Delete
Names Log
Browse Pages
Compare pages
Special Pages
Personal tools
Sign in
Create account
Donate
Volunteer
Help
▼
Contents
Search
FAQ
Support
Portals
Watercooler
Suggestions
Family:David Whipple and Hannah Tower (1)
Views
Family
Talk
Edit
History
What links here
more
▼
Print
Watchers
Waterart
Jrich
Klaidlaw
Jhamstra
Browse
Whipple
in
Hingham
Tower
in
Hingham
Parents:
John Whipple and Sarah Hutchinson
David Whipple
chr.
28 Sep 1656
Dorchester, Suffolk, Massachusetts, United States
d.
18 Dec 1710
Attleboro, Bristol, Massachusetts, United States
Parents:
John Tower and Margret Ibrook
Hannah Tower
chr.
17 Jul 1652
Hingham, Plymouth, Massachusetts, United States
d.
Aft 1710
m.
13 Dec 1677
Hingham, Plymouth, Massachusetts, United States
Family tree
▼
Facts and Events
Marriage Banns
[3]
11 Nov 1677
Marriage
[1]
[2]
[3]
13 Dec 1677
Hingham, Plymouth, Massachusetts, United States
Children
Birth
Death
Add child
References
↑
Hingham, Plymouth, Massachusetts, United States.
Vital Records of Hingham, Massachusetts, ca. 1639-1844
. (New England Historic Genealogical Society)
15.
David Whiple & Hannah Tower M Dec 13 1677.
↑
Massachusetts, United States.
Massachusetts Marriages, 1695-1910
. (FamilySearch Record Search).
the husband's name is transcribed as "Daniel Whiple"
↑
3.0
3.1
Source:Anderson, Robert Charles. Great Migration Begins: Immigrants to New England, 1620-1633
gives the date of the marriage as 11 Nov 1677 at Hingham, citing
Source:Providence, Providence, Rhode Island, United States. Early Records of the Town of Providence
. There is a good chance the date in Providence was the date of publication of marriage intentions, and since the marriage took place in Hingham even according to Providence records, it seems more likely that the Hingham record is the correct date of marriage.
Don't want ads?