ViewsWatchers |
Calciscat I've taken the liberty of making some format adjustments in your person article, and eliminated some redundancy at the bottom of the page. If you'd prefer I'll restore it to the way it was originally. Q 07:53, 30 May 2008 (EDT) [add comment] [edit] "added data"? [28 June 2010]I'm not sure I understand what you are doing with this. Your edit explanation said you were adding data from a "gedCom", which is fine, but I don't see any additions---just the removal of Calciscat source information. That's actually fairly useful for the eventual expansion of this article. Is there a reason why it should be jettisoned? Q 21:02, 28 June 2010 (EDT) |