User talk:Leebuck1986

Welcome

Welcome to WeRelate, your virtual genealogical community. We're glad you have joined us. At WeRelate you can easily create ancestor web pages, connect with cousins and other genealogists, and find new information. To get started:

• Take the WeRelate tour to see what you can do
• Watch the "Getting Started" tutorial videos and learn how to make wiki pages for your ancestors
• Explore the Step by step Tutorials, if needed
• Create a User Profile page to tell other people about yourself and the families you are researching
• Read the etiquette page to learn expected behavior on a wiki
• Find other ways to get involved on the community portal
• Ask questions on our Support page

If you need any help, I will be glad to answer your questions. Just click on my signature link below and then click on the “Leave a message” link under my name in the upper left corner of my profile page. Thanks for participating and see you around! Debbie Freeman --DFree 22:16, 8 January 2011 (EST)

Lawrence James Browngedge [20 January 2011]

Would this James Browngedge be one and the same?

IN DIVORCE.

(Before Mr. Justice Owen) HOWLAND v HOWLAND.

This suit, the issues in which were tried by a Jury, was before his Honor after an ad-

journment of a week on the questlon of the

form of the decree to be pronounced in the case. The petitioner, Jack Howland, motor

garage proprietor, of Wellington, sued for a

divorce from Florence Howland (formerly Len

nard), alleging adultery with one James Browngedge, who was joined as co-respond ent. The petitioner and respondent were married in 1901, at Wellington, according to the rites of the Church of England. The wife filed an issue alleging that her husbnnd had committed adultery with a married woman named Rene Brlndley, and claimed a divorce on that ground. The allegation of adultery on the part of the petitioner was also made by the co-respondent, anid Mrs. Brindlev in- tervened in the suit, denying the respondent and co-respondent's allegations. The Jury found the issue of adultery between the re- spondent, Florence Howland, and the co-re- spondent, James Browngedge proved, by a ma- jority of 9 to 3. They also found the issue of adultery raised by the wife between Jack Howland, the petitioner, and Mrs. Rene Brind- ley proved unanimously. They dismissed an allegation of cruelty by Mrs. Howland against her husband. Mr. Curtis and Mr. Symonds (instructed by Messrs. C. E. Chapman and Co.) appeared for the petitioner; Mr. Toose and Mr. Little (instructed by Messrs. Gilder, McMaster, Holland, and Gilder) for the re- spondent; Mr. Boyce and Mr. H. G. Edwards (instructed by Messrs. Glider, McMaster, Hol- land, and Glider) for the co-respondent; and Mr. Mack, K.C., and Mr. Sherwood (instructed by Mr. W. P. Kelly, of Wellington, by his Syd- ney agents, Messrs. Collins and Mulholland)

for the intervener.

His Honor dismissed both the husband's and the wife's petitions, and ordered the husband to pay the wife's costs. The co-respondent and the intervener were ordered each to pay

their own costs.

(Bofore Mr. Actlng-Justice Ralston.)--burgjoh 17:35, 9 January 2011 (EST)

Hi Have been asking around family members but no one seems to know if it is the same person. All i know is evelyn my great grandmother divorced lawrence and he remarried isobel clem not long after. Will keep looking through family papers and see if lawrence lived in the same town around this time. cheers--Leebuck1986 22:33, 19 January 2011 (EST)

Buckingham Family Tree(1) - 2012-07-16 09-56-19.zip does not appear to be a GEDCOM [15 July 2012]

We were not able to import your file because it does not appear to be a GEDCOM file. You might want to read this help page.

For questions or problems, leave a message for Dallan or send an email to dallan@WeRelate.org.

--WeRelate agent 19:58, 15 July 2012 (EDT)