Person:Mary Post (31)

Watchers
m. 31 Mar 1652
  1. Margaret Post1653/54 - 1700
  2. Elizabeth Post1654/55 - 1715
  3. John Post1657 - 1690
  4. Sarah Post1659 - Aft 1702
  5. Mary PostEst 1662 - 1705
  6. Abigail Post1664 - 1676
  7. Samuel Post1667/68 - 1735
  8. Hannah Post1671 -
  9. Lydia Post1674 -
m. 16 Apr 1685
  1. Mary Rudd1695/96 -
Facts and Events
Name[1] Mary Post
Married Name Mary Rudd
Gender Female
Birth[1] Est 1662 Norwich, New London, Connecticut, United StatesEstimate based on dates of births of siblings.
Marriage 16 Apr 1685 Norwich, New London, Connecticut, United Statesto Nathaniel Rudd
Death[1][2][3] Nov 1705 Franklin, New London, Connecticut, United StatesFranklin was taken off from Norwich in 1786.
References
  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Mary Post (18), in Walworth, Reuben Hyde. Hyde Genealogy: or, the Descendants, in the Female as Well as in the Male Lines, from William Hyde of Norwich With Their Places of Residence, and Dates of Births, Marriages, &c., and Other Particulars of Them and Their Families and Ancestry. (Albany, New York: J. Munsell, 1864)
    13-14.

    "Mary Post (18), born at Norwich in 1662, the third daughter of Hester Hyde (3) and John Post, was a granddaughter of William Hyde (1) the first of Norwich. She m. 16 April, 1685, Nathaniel Rudd of Norwich. He was a son of Jonathan Rudd of Hartford, who removed to Saybrook, and was m. 1647, at Bride Brook. He came to Norwich soon after its settlement. They settled at Norwich, where she died in Nov., 1705."

  2. Norwich, New London, Connecticut, United States. Vital Records of Norwich, 1659-1848. (Hartford, Conn.: Society of Colonial Wars in the State of Connecticut, 1913)
    1:50.

    "Mary the Wife of the sd Nathaniell Rudd Deceafed Novembr 1705"

  3. Franklin Vital Records [NEHGS], in Connecticut, United States. The Barbour Collection of Connecticut Town Vital Records
    65.

    "Rudd, … Mary, [w. Nathaniel], d. Nov. [__], 1705 [2:314]"

  4.   Mary Post Rudd, in Find A Grave.

    This burial is not documented in the Hale Collection. There appears to be no evidence of the actual place of burial.