Person:Martha Foster (25)

Watchers
m. 20 Apr 1750
  1. Samuel Foster1751 -
  2. William Foster1753 -
  3. Jane Foster1755 -
  4. Martha Foster1760 - 1821
  • HPaul Dudley1757 - 1847
  • WMartha Foster1760 - 1821
m. 27 Apr 1779
  1. Catherine Dudley1781 -
  2. Lucy Dudley1783 - 1859
  3. Paul Dudley1785 -
  4. John Dudley1787 -
  5. Samuel Dudley1789 -
Facts and Events
Name Martha Foster
Gender Female
Birth[1][4] 21 Apr 1760 Roxbury, Suffolk, Massachusetts, United States
Christening[2] 6 Jul 1760 Roxbury, Suffolk, Massachusetts, United States
Marriage 27 Apr 1779 Roxbury, Suffolk, Massachusetts, United Statesto Paul Dudley
Death[3] 18 Nov 1821 Milford, Penobscot, Maine, United States
References
  1. Roxbury, Suffolk, Massachusetts, United States. Vital Records of Roxbury, Massachusetts, to the End of the Year 1849. (Salem, Massachusetts: Essex Institute, 1925-1926)
    Vol. 1, p. 134.

    FOSTER, Martha, d. John [deceased July 6. CR1], and Jane, [born] Apr. 21, 1760.

  2. Record Commissioners of Boston. Roxbury Land and Church Records. (Boston, Massachusetts: Rockwell & Churchill, City Printers, 1881)
    p. 154.

    1760.
    July 6.
    Martha, the daughter of John Foster, deceased, and Jane his wife.

  3. "Paul Dudley of Milford, Maine", in Porter, Joseph W. (Joseph Whitcomb). The Maine Historical Magazine (formerly Bangor Historical Magazine). (Porter, Joseph W)
    Vol. 6, p. 174.

    Paul Dudley m. Roxbury 27 Apr 1779, b. 21 Apr 1759 [sic, see comment], d. 18 Nov 1821. Her gravestone is at North Milford.

  4. Source:Dudley, Dean. Dudley Genealogies and Family Records, p. 85, says Martha was b. 21 Apr 1769. An article in Source:Maine Historical Magazine (Porter, Joseph W), vol. 6, p. 174, says she was b. 21 Apr 1759. Apparently the birth record is hard to read, but the baptismal record seems to fix the year as probably 1760.