|
Facts and Events
Name[4] |
Hannah Jennings |
Gender |
Female |
Birth[1][2][4] |
22 Jan 1777 |
Orange, Franklin, Massachusetts, United States |
Marriage |
23 Feb 1796 |
Royalston, Worcester, Massachusetts, United Statesto Andrew Kendall |
Residence[3] |
1850 |
Middlesex, Washington, Vermont, United StatesAge 73; with Lyman Kendall, a. 40 |
Death[1] |
8 Sep 1851 |
Montpelier, Washington, Vermont, United States |
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Vermont, United States. Vermont, Vital Records, 1760-1954: Database with images. (FamilySearch. Citing Secretary of State. State Capitol Building, Montpelier.)
[1].
Full name of deceased: Kendall, Hannah age: 74 yrs 7 mos. 17 days [birth calculates to about 22 Jan 1777] spouse: Andrew Kendall Esq. Date of death: 08 Sep 1851 Cemetery: Elm St., Montpelier event place: Montpelier, Vermont, United States film number: 0027603 digital folder number: 4667007 image number: 00015
- ↑ Royalston, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States. Vital records of Royalston, Massachusetts, to the end of the year 1849. (Worcester, Massachusetts: Franklin P. Rice, 1906)
122, 123.
Jennings [Jinnings in int.] Hannah of Orange and Andrew Kendall, Feb. 23, 1796. Kendall, Andrew and Hannah Jennings of Orange, Feb. 23, 1796.
- ↑ Washington, Vermont, United States. 1850 U.S. Census Population Schedule
line 33.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Birth place inferred from residence at marriage. Many online trees suggest that Andrew's wife is Hannah Jennings, the daughter of Benjamin Jennings and Elisabeth Gilbert, of Brookfield. Please see the talk page for a discussion of why this is likely to be incorrect. Other sources (e.g., Find A Grave) suggests she is Hannah Bearce Jennings. But that Hannah was born 21 Jul 1777 not 21 Jan 1777 suggested by her age at death (per Pembroke, MA, VRs, p. 115), while her father moved to Warwick providing an explanation for her location at marriage, she married 1796 but her father's probate (Hampshire Box 78, file 40) opened in 1797 still refers to her as Hannah Jennings. This could be lack of knowledge by the judge, this situation suffers from no positive identification and some doubts raised about a likely identification. More information is needed.
|
|