|
|
Family tree▼ Facts and Events
Children
| | Birth | Death |
|---|
| 1. |
|
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
Bef May 1700 |
| 5. |
|
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
|
| 8. |
|
Est 1674 |
|
References
- ↑ Yates Publishing. U.S. and International Marriage Records, 1560-1900: [database online] (not considered a reliable primary source). (Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2004)
Source number: 1498.000; Source type: Electronic Database; Number of Pages: 1; Submitter Code: LSS.
Birth date: 1640Birth place: MAMarriage date: 1677Marriage place: MA
Source #S1 was said to support a marriage date of 9 Sep 1660. Given the published VR, I suspect this was a misinterpretation of month no. 9, which before the 1753 calendar shift meant November, not September. Therefore I changed it to support the November date even though I haven't seen the cited source. Several other sources can be cited that support November. - Jrich
- ↑ Duxbury, Plymouth, Massachusetts, United States. Vital Records of Duxbury, Massachusetts, to the Year 1850. (Boston, Massachusetts: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 1911)
304.
Sebury, Samuell [dup. Samuel Seabury] and Patience Kemp, Nov. 16, 1660. [int. not recorded]
- ↑ Weymouth, Norfolk, Massachusetts, United States. Vital Records of Weymouth, Massachusetts, to the Year 1850. (Boston, Massachusetts: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 1910)
2:168.
Seaburn, Samuel and Patience Kempe, Nov. 9, 1660. [int. not recorded]
- ↑ There is not a significant difference between these two dates, but considering the full set of Samuel Seabury's marriage records (including second wife Martha Pabodie), it is very likely that the Duxbury record of 16 Nov 1660 was recorded in Duxbury after the fact (e.g., on the occasion of the death of Patience, or upon the birth of his children, or upon Samuel's remarriage). Thus, it would seem more likely that the Weymouth record is the more contemporary of the two records, and hence the more likely to be correct. - Jrich
|
|
